We have all heard the statistics that
for every convert we make to the Catholic faith, seven people leave. Perhaps
you have also heard that somewhere around 70% of those that enter the Church at
the Easter vigil do not consistently attend Mass a year later.
Why is that?
The reasons are numerous, but not
committing enough attention to the ministry of evangelization is probably at
the top of the list. We need to make a
clear distinction between evangelization and catechesis, even while they are
integrally related. Evangelization is the work of reaching people’s hearts
through personal encounters. Catechesis is primarily the work of helping
converts understand what they have come to believe.
Evangelization requires a personal and narrative
witness to the saving message of the Gospel—the proclamation of the Kerygma and
a spiritual encounter with Jesus Christ.
Put simply, a person evangelizes by being a bridge for people to Jesus
Christ and a deeper relationship with him. Think of how Andrew brought Peter to
Jesus or the Samaritan woman brought Jesus to her village. This distinction is
at the heart of the Church’s understanding of the RCIA process, but it is often
ignored at great cost.
Catechesis is the work of teaching what the
Church believes. What exactly is the body of truth into which we are to live?
This is the object of catechetical instruction and can only happen effectively
after a person has come to faith in Jesus. This is how it works developmentally
in a person’s life. Arguments and logic are not operative in evangelization. When the time is right, we instruct people in the content
of the faith and elevate their understanding of the sacred mysteries. Catholics
are good at this and have been for centuries. Education has always been a
strength for us.
However—and this is what has become
so terribly obvious—catechesis does not generally impact people if the person
being catechized has not been evangelized first and come to faith in Jesus
Christ. Why explain the “what” if one has not first encountered and come to
believe in the “who”? This distinction explains why we need a “new”
evangelization. Over centuries, Catholics have catechized a culturally
conditioned population but without adequately evangelizing those baptized
mostly as infants. Now Christian culture is gone. Today, our children can go
through twelve years of Catholic school and leave the faith within weeks of
going to college.
Evangelization is also not
apologetics. Most commonly today, apologetics is the work of arguing in defense
of the doctrine of the Catholic faith against the critique of naysayers. A
first type of apologetics is the attempt to demonstrate the basis of our
Catholics beliefs in relationship to other non-Catholic Christians. This form
of apologetics requires people to accept Christ and assume the authority of
Scripture if we are to engage them at this level of discourse.
The other form of apologetics is when
we intellectually defend the content of the Catholic faith against
non-believers. In this case, we are not trying to “prove” or demonstrate by
logic the content of our faith, or even convert the other. Rather, we are trying
to demonstrate that nothing in the datum of faith is contrary to reason. The
latter form of apologetics does not presume faith, but neither is it the work
of evangelization or catechesis.
I have laid out these distinctions
because well-meaning and motivated Catholics typically attempt to bring others
to the faith at the wrong level of engagement from a developmental perspective.
By developmental I am referring to the fact that discipleship is a gradual
growth process, much like the natural human process of maturation. When we
consider what Sherry Weddell calls the “thresholds” of conversion, which are
reflected beautifully in the catechumenal model (RCIA), we have to acknowledge
that we are dealing with a spiritual process of maturation that we cannot
handle in a perfunctory way.
Most current pastoral efforts to present the faith happen on a catechetical, apologetic or even theological level. All of these engage the other on a rational level of discourse through expository explanations, argument and reason. Those who do seek to evangelize, and the numbers are not great here, tend to presume far too much in those they do engage, and often fail to build relationships and establish real trust. These approaches have not worked well because rational engagement and ‘strategies to convince’ miss several crucial steps in the growth process of a disciple. The pithy way to say this is that we must reach the heart through love and mercy before we can reach the head with truth.
✠
Photo by Gift Habeshaw on Unsplash
Recent Comments